|
Lecturer(s)
|
-
Klapetek Martin, Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Erban Vít, PhDr. Ph.D.
-
Ber Viktor, Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Kolářová Lucie, Mgr. Dr. theol.
-
Machula Tomáš, prof. Ph.D., Th.D.
-
Heider Daniel, doc. Ph.D.
-
Sirovátka Jakub, doc. Dr. phil.
-
Novotný Daniel D., Ph.D.
-
Novák Lukáš, Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Šimek Vojtěch, PhDr. Th.D.
|
|
Course content
|
The form and content of consultations are up to specific teachers. During the accreditation of study programs, we saw the meaning of tutorial seminars in closer cooperation between teachers and students. It is recommended to consult regularly, to suggest other literature that would suitably supplement their state of study, to discuss ambiguities, overlaps, the meaning of what they are learning, etc.
|
|
Learning activities and teaching methods
|
|
Individual tutoring
|
|
Learning outcomes
|
The main idea of the tutorial seminar is to make small groups of students around individual members of the department/teachers who would provide these students with more intensive consultations leading to more personal guidance during their studies (literature recommendations, talks on things related to more subjects - to make things fit together and students understood them better, etc.). In other words, the student has someone to turn to and consult with him about his course of study. The inspiration here is the traditional Oxford system of connecting the student more to his advisor, the guarantor.
The student deepened: - communication with the teacher - systematic search of information sources - solving problems related to the study of the bachelor's program
|
|
Prerequisites
|
The student completed the Tutor Seminars 1, 2 and 3.
|
|
Assessment methods and criteria
|
Student performance assessment, Interim evaluation
The student is active and in regular contact with the teacher.
|
|
Recommended literature
|
|